Last week, I wrote a series of posts addressed to a theatre major getting ready to graduate about "finding your why." Let me take a moment to state the obvious: finding your "why" is critical not only to you personally, but to your theatre as well.
Simon Sinek, in the video I have linked to several times, tells us that "people don't buy what you do, they buy why you do it," and that you don't want to sell to everyone who wants to buy your product, but to those who "believe what you believe." In other words, you don't want to sell your productions as just another commodity, but rather create what Seth Godin would call a "tribe" that is committed to the type of work that you find valuable.
If you look at all the mission statements for theatres across this US, what you will find most of the time are bland generalities that basically boils down to "we do theatre," which is a what. If the "why" of your theatre is "so I can promote my career," there is nothing there for the potential audience to buy into, no reason for them to be loyal, or to follow the development of your work. People don't buy what you do, they buy why you do it.
Many of the large regional institutions started out with a very strong "why," which came out of the passionate beliefs of the founders. But it is when leadership is passed from the founder to the next generation that mission "slip," as Sinek calls it in the chapter of "Start With Why" called "Slip Happens," is most likely to occur. The board goes out looking for a new leader, and finds somebody who is dynamic and charismatic, but who has an entirely different idea for the organization. And that's fine, as long as the organization completely changes direction. But it rarely does, because the Board also wants to hold onto the already-existing audience, all of whom bought the "why" of the founder. The result often ends up being a "fuzzy why," and slowly the audience will drift away, because they instinctively will sense that something has changed -- they no longer know "who you are."
So develop a clear, dynamic "why for your theatre, one that everyone is on board with. If the only way to get agreement is to create a "why" that is bland and general, so that it covers all the bases at once, then you have problem that may only be solved by getting rid of those who don't share the vision. Jim Collins says that an important part of going from "good to great" is to get the right people on the bus. The first step to doing that is to make sure the bus is clearly labeled with a destination, and that everybody on the bus wants to go there.
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Think Again: Funding and Budgets in the Arts
Every once in a while, I think I'll post a link or two to posts written earlier in the life of Theatre Ideas that seem worth revisiting ...
When Vulture writer Jason P. Frank published his interview with 1776 cast member Sara Porkalob on October 14th, the online theater world h...
In an essay entitled "Defining Racism: Can We Talk?," from her book Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? ...
Recently, we had a discussion in my Theatre of the Oppressed class about the question: what makes theatre "good"? What are the ch...